 |
Watch The Wizard of Oz Online.
Movie Title: The Wizard of Oz The Wizard of Oz is available for streaming or downloading. |
Like most baby boomers, I’ve watched this film dozens of times in the past on broadcast TV, then VHS tape, then LaserDisc … but I had never actually SEEN “The Wizard of Oz” until this newly restored DVD came out. It’s an astonishing transfer. The sepia-tone Kansas sequences are startlingly racy and definite, and the Technicolored world “Over the Rainbow” is truly comely. I found myself fascinated by details I had never noticed before: the glittering corn stalks in the Scarecrow’s field; the mirror-like floors of the Emerald City; the polished buttons on the guardsmen’s uniforms. Incredibly, even the individual grains of red sand in the Witch’s hourglass stood out and glistened! All these minor-but-sumptuous visual details served to heighten the magical spell that the film has always woven, enhancing the performances, the anecdote, and the music.
The DVD extras are a mind-boggling embarrassment of riches. The “Making Of” documentary hosted by the incomparable Angela Lansbury is worth the notice of the DVD alone, but there’s so distinguished more: an international poster gallery, interviews with cast members, deleted scenes, production stills, radio clips, etc, etc. There’s enough material to withhold even the most casual viewer fascinated for hours, and a fair Oz buff will be occupied for days!
If you only bought a DVD player to survey this one disc, it would well be worth the expense. Treat yourself, and descend in cherish with this classic film again … for the first time.
I was unprejudiced critized for foisting off the following review of the 3-disk DVD state as a review of the fresh Blu-ray. I didn’t; Amazon did. As anyone who’s been here for a while will gaze, Amazon throws all DVD reviews into the same bucket, regardless of the edition. So don’t blame me.
Buy,Download, Or Stream The Wizard of Oz! Click Here
Buy,Download, Or Stream The Wizard of Oz! Click Here
I unprejudiced got the Blu-ray, and will have some comments on it at the destroy.
Buy,Download, Or Stream The Wizard of Oz! Click Here
There’s no need to discuss “The Wizard of Oz” itself, a classic among classics (though I’ll have something to say about its “philosophy” later on) . You probably want to know whether the UltraResolution transfer justifies the occupy.
It does. Oh, yes it does.
“The Wizard of Oz” has always looked kindly, one of the better Technicolor films. Unlike “Gone With the Wind”, which was generally sad and desaturated, and which UltraResolution greatly improved, I didn’t inquire of worthy enhancement for “Oz”.
Was I ever atrocious. I stared with my jaw hanging originate. “Oz” is the best UltraResolution transfer by far — and the others were not exactly chopped liver.
The improvement in detail and sharpness is startling, especially as the unusual prints did not seem obviously lacking in either. Even more fabulous is the expansion of the tonal scale. Sunless scenes (particularly those in the forest and outside the “witches” castle) are now filled with rich detail. Have you ever noticed how exquisite the Winkies’ red, white, and gray uniforms are? I hadn’t — until now.
These enhancements combine get the biggest improvement of all — a major revelation of _texture_. The “feltiness” of many costumes is clear. The burlap of the Scarecrow’s face is now plainly visible, particularly in the close-up where he misstates the Pythagorean Theorem. And the Lion’s costume is a thick pile of fur you want to arrive out and stroke. You can leer every last strand of hair.
I’m exaggerating only slightly when I say the improvements of this UltraResolution transfer are not mighty less than those from cleaning the Sistine Chapel’s frescos. It’s as if layers of murk and grime — that you never even knew were there! — have been stripped away. Until you opinion it, you cannot imagine what this film (that is, the unusual camera negatives) _really_ looks like. It’s a shame the people who created “Oz” never got to examine it this diagram.
The image quality is so high that I often felt as if I were looking through a window at live performers. (Well, almost.) No matter what versions you already have, you won’t be disappointed with this one. I watched it twice in two days, and I might even belief it a third time tonight.
My only quibble is that several matte paintings do not blend properly, because the hues at the join lines do not match those of the scene. This could have been fixed; I suspect it seemed too powerful work for a dinky improvement. (A friend suggested that these sorts of things are left in because videophiles savor finding them.)
As to the differences between the two- and three-disk sets… The latter includes a packet of fresh programs and promotional material of the sort we haven’t seen in 40 years ago. (Remember the 50-cent deluxe programs for road-show films? ) There’s also a station of 10 reproductions of Kodachrome publicity photographs. For this viewer, these extras alone explain the higher brand.
The third disk will be of most interest to lovers of all things Oz. It includes a handsomely produced biography of L. Frank Baum (though-provoking enough that you might want to perceive it more than once), plus all the restful Oz films and a Technicolor Oz cartoon. The existence of these is famed to anyone familiar with the history of Oz productions, but they’ve never appeared (as far as I know) in any home-video format.
The films are problematic. The two from Baum’s production company are the best — they have style, charm, and imagination. The others are cheesy ripoffs that own tiny relation to the modern book. The Larry Semon — a once wildly-popular but now virtually forgotten cartoonist and amusing * — version is especially unsuitable, as it is dinky more than a vehicle for Semon’s designate of physical comedy. The Baum estate is at least partly to blame — _any_ movie version must have seemed more radiant than none, especially as the technology to originate a convincing version of “Oz” would not exist for another 15 years.
The film’s opening titles praise the book’s “pleasant philosophy”, which seems to be either “You already have everything you need to be pleased”, or “The acknowledge to your problems lies within yourself”. These are not so remarkable “suitable” as reflections of the hard-nosed “All your problems are your occupy fault” and “If you’re not a success, it’s because you’re inactive” homilies that grew out of the tall opportunity for personal development and material success this country offered.
I contain L. Frank Baum had something a bit different in mind. “The Wizard of Oz” is a fairy sage in which magic has no bearing on the issues at the center of the memoir. I have Baum wanted to discourage children from fantasizing that magic could be a solution to one’s problems.
So… he has the four principals obtain a grueling scuttle to the Emerald City, then glean the wizard is a humbug. (What a shame the blander “erroneous”, “fraud”, or “phony” have replaced that appetizing word.) He posesses no magic to supply wit, savor, or grit, which the Scarecrow, Tin Woodman, and Cowardly Lion have demonstrated they already have.
Baum’s “right” is simple — Savor, wisdom, and courage are what we need to rep through life. No one can _give_ them to us, because we _already_ hold them, and all we need to do is impart them.
“Is that legal? ”
“That’s all it is.”
Now… the quiz you’ve been waiting for the reply to… Is the Blu-ray residence worth the heed?
I viewed the Blu-ray on a Pioneer 60″ Pro Kuro, fed from a Sony BDP-S550. I also watched the DVD on the Pioneer (fed from the same Blu-ray player), and on a 36″ Sony 400-series WEGA “improved definition” TV (fed from a Sony DVP-S7000) .
The DVD remains a terrific DVD, and looks terrific on a high-quality 480i monitor. (Peer the preceding review.) It was, and level-headed is, a demo-quality DVD.
When played on the BD player, and upconverted to 1080p, the DVD’s image on the Kuro is pleasing darn safe — the sharpness and detail are at least “acceptable”. But when you play the Blu-ray disk, the image goes from “acceptable” to almost-startling. Two examples… Stamp the enhanced detail and texture in the weather-beaten wood above the WWE’s humdrum legs. And in the crowd scenes, you can notice (fair about) every Munchkin face. There is virtually no smearing of detail.
So… should you urge fair out in a buying frenzy and pick up the BD edition? It depends.
The DVD is capable enough for an obedient recount on a high-quality SD monitor. But even upconverted, it isn’t suitable enough for a _large_ HD present. If you have, say, a 40″ display; your BD player has a first-rate upconverter (not all do) ; and you don’t sit “on top of” the camouflage (as I do) ; you might behold minute incompatibility between the DVD and the Blu-ray.
But if you’re a video fuss-budget (as I am) and sit closer than the “experts” recommend (why _shouldn’t_ you? ), you will almost certainly grasp the Blu-ray. It’s your call.
A few remarks on the extras… The wristwatch, as the kid in the Ally bank commercial says, is a share of junk. The do shows no particular style, wit, or imagination. And as others have said, “The Dreamer of OZ” is a poor transfer, very badly unpconverted to 1080. It is not of acceptable quality, and should have been do on the DVD disk.
I will approach help later (I hope) with some more comments on the sound and the other extras. Forcing yourself to repeatedly gawk titanic chunks of a movie, regardless of its quality, is an ennervating experience.
Libido booster – solution for your problems!
“Libido booster” that has shown to be safe?